Validation

Third-party validated • independent lab testing

The data behind
the machine.

Before you spend a dollar, look at the numbers. Every claim CuraFlo™ makes is backed by third-party laboratory analysis on real cannabis flower — measured for microbial reduction and for what the process does to potency and terpenes.

TYMC reduction
>99.8%
Across validation batches VAL-001 through VAL-003, all passing state action limits post-treatment.
THC variance
<0.2%
Pre- vs post-treatment total THC. Potency stays where your COA says it is.
Process
Dry
No chemicals, no irradiation, no ozone, no moisture reintroduced to cured flower.

Validation batch results

Independent laboratory analysis, pre- and post-treatment, on the same material. Full certificates of analysis available on request.

Full COAs available on request
Batch Material TYMC before TYMC after Reduction THC before THC after Result
VAL-001 [STRAIN / MATERIAL] [X,XXX CFU/g] [XXX CFU/g] >99.8% [XX.X%] [XX.X%] PASS
VAL-002 [STRAIN / MATERIAL] [X,XXX CFU/g] [XXX CFU/g] >99.8% [XX.X%] [XX.X%] PASS
VAL-003 [STRAIN / MATERIAL] [X,XXX CFU/g] [XXX CFU/g] >99.8% [XX.X%] [XX.X%] PASS
Testing performed by [LAB NAME], [LICENSE #], [DATE RANGE]. Method: [TEST METHOD]. Results reflect the specific material, moisture content, and process parameters used in these runs; outcomes vary by input material and SOP. Full certificates of analysis, including terpene panels and complete cannabinoid profiles, are available on request.

Why it doesn’t hurt the flower

Cold plasma is a surface process. It acts where the microbes are and leaves the trichome chemistry alone.

01

Surface-acting

Reactive species generated in the plasma field inactivate yeast, mold, and fungal spores on the surface of the flower — which is where the contamination lives.

02

No heat, no ionizing radiation

Cannabinoids and terpenes degrade under heat and UV, which is why autoclaving and UV are non-starters. Cold plasma operates near ambient temperature.

03

Dry and residue-free

No solvents, no chemical carriers, no water. Nothing is added to the material and nothing needs to be removed afterward.

How it compares

The honest version. Every method reduces TYMC — the question is what it costs you in quality, logistics, and consumer perception.

Cold plasma (CuraFlo™)

  • Runs on-site, in your facility
  • No heat or ionizing radiation
  • Terpene and cannabinoid retention
  • Dry, chemical-free, no residue
  • Repeatable, documentable SOP

Gamma irradiation

  • Highly effective on TYMC
  • Requires a licensed nuclear facility
  • Product ships off-site and back
  • Reported reductions in terpene levels
  • Consumer stigma around “irradiated”

E-beam / beta

  • Effective on TYMC
  • Requires an electron accelerator
  • Off-site processing and chain of custody
  • High capital and per-run cost
  • Same irradiation labeling questions

Ozone

  • Can be run on-site
  • Known to strip terpenes
  • Noticeable effect on aroma and flavor
  • Worker exposure controls required
  • Inconsistent batch-to-batch results

Independent published research

Don’t take our word for it. Peer-reviewed work on cold plasma in cannabis, published by researchers with no relationship to CuraFlo.

Journal of Cannabis Research · 2020

Effects of cold plasma, gamma and e-beam irradiations on reduction of fungal colony forming unit levels in medical cannabis inflorescences

Jerushalmi, Ovadia, Shapira, Alkalai-Tuvia, Fallik & Sionov. Tested three post-harvest sterilization methods head-to-head on both uninoculated and Botrytis cinerea-inoculated medical cannabis inflorescences, measuring total yeast and mold CFU per gram. Cold plasma achieved approximately 5-log TYM reduction — comparable to e-beam — without the heat or ionizing radiation that degrade cannabinoids and terpenes.

Read the full paper (open access) ↗
Industrial Crops and Products · 2025

Enhancing drying efficiency and terpene retention of cannabis using cold plasma pretreatment

Found that cold plasma pretreatment preserved over 80% of terpene concentrations relative to untreated dried cannabis, with treatments at 300 W achieving over 90% retention and 400 W for 30 seconds retaining approximately 96% of total terpenes — while also shortening drying time.

View on ScienceDirect ↗
Frontiers in Microbiology · Review

Fungal and mycotoxin contaminants in cannabis and hemp flowers: implications for consumer health

A review of post-harvest decontamination options for cannabis, noting that cold plasma and e-beam each achieved roughly 5-log TYM reduction in medical cannabis, and summarizing the trade-offs of each method against product quality and cost.

Read the review ↗
These publications are independent academic research on cold plasma technology generally. They are provided as background on the underlying science and do not constitute testing of, or an endorsement of, CuraFlo™ systems specifically. For results on our equipment, see our validation data above and request the full certificates of analysis.

Get the full data package

Complete certificates of analysis, terpene panels, and the full validation report. Or book a call and walk through it with our team.

Book an ROI Call ↗
We’ll send the full validation package — typically within one business day. No sales sequence, no drip campaign.

What you’ll receive

  • Full certificates of analysis VAL-001 through VAL-003, unredacted, pre- and post-treatment.
  • Terpene retention panel Individual terpene concentrations before and after processing.
  • Complete cannabinoid profile Total THC, THCA, CBD, and minor cannabinoids, both sides of treatment.
  • Process parameters Run times, throughput, and the SOP used to produce these results.
  • Access to our Chief Science Officer For regulatory or technical questions your team needs answered directly.